Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ORIENTAL SHIPPING CO. LTD. versus MONTE CRISTO' PANAMIAN FLAG


In the form of a bank guarantee on the order of section 35 High Court, in the form of a decree the defendant's claim in the admission suit is required to be protected. The property of the money
1982 C L C 619

[Quetta]

Before Zakaullah Lodhi Actg. C. J. and Muhammad jafar Naim, J

ORIENTAL SHIPPING Co. LTD.-Appellant

versus

M.V. MONTE CRISTO PANAMIAN FLAG ETC. -Respondents

Application in Admiralty Appeal No. I of 1980, decided on 29th. September, 1981.

Admiralty Court Act, 1861-

-- S. 35-Security submitted in form of Bank guarantee on order from High Court-Required to protect claim of plaintiff in admiralty suit in case of a decree-Application for release of Bank guarantee rejected -Bank guarantee, however, directed to be released on depositing original title deed of property of same amount with Registrar of High Court.

Naseem-ud-Din for Appellant.

Respondents Nos. 2 and 4: Ex Parte. Mustafa Lakhani for Respondent 3.

Munawar Ahmad, Advocate-General on Court Notice.

Date of hearing: 29th September, 1981.

JUDGMENT

ZACAULLAH LODH1, ACTG. C. J.-After we had heard the Appeal at some length, we realised that the questions of law required interpretation in this appeal are common in the suit as well. It would thus be proper to leave it open to the learned Single Judge who would try the suit to interpret the points of law raised before us today, in the suit and pass a final verdict, as otherwise, if a judgment is given by us in this Appeal which is filed against the interim order the findings of the learned Single Judge would certainly be prejudiced. Presently the main question before us is that of discharge or otherwise of the security submitted by respondent No. 3 in the form of Bank Guarantee under the orders of this Court dated 21st December, 1980. The learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the effect to continuance of the security would be that the respondent shall have he bear the interest on the amount of security for further period and he would receive no recompense for the same if he succeeds in the suit. Release of Bank Guarantee at this stage would not be proper as in that case no security would be left to protect the claim of the plaintiff in the suit and it would be difficult for him to realise the decretal amount in can a decree is passed in his favour. However, to resolve this controversy all the learned counsel as well as the learned Advocate-General agree that if the respondent No. 3 furnishes security of the same amount by depositing the original title deed of the property with the Registrar of this Court, the Bank guarantee may be released. If that is done, the Registrar shall inform the concened Registrar not to dispose of this property or allow the creation of any lien thereon, unless directed by this Court.

With these observations, the appeal is disposed of.

M. H. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Sara e Naurang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.