PAK TELECOM MOBILE LTD. versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
Changes in legal status under the Federal Government's License Scope Policy Directives under Section 22 and 8 Mobile Cellular Policy (Federal Government), 2004, Paris 4 - 4 and 5 4 Annual Spectrum Administrative Fees (ASAF), Section 8 Demand for Pakistan Telecommunications (Reorganization) Act, 1996, Appellant Company status, which provided mobile cellular services, was licensed by PTA in August 1998, under different terms and conditions , Fees, and so on. The appellant company was obliged to pay the PTA. The PTA sent a showcase notice to the Appellant Company on 27 10 2008 demanding payment of the annual Spectrum Administrative Fees (ASAF) PTA claimed on the basis of paragraphs 4 and 5. The appellant company has been charged a fee. The federal government's mobile cellular policy read in 2004 with clause 2 of the license issued to the appellant company, in 2004, the appellant company claimed that it was not obligated to pay ASF. Because of the existence of paragraph 4 of the federal government's mobile cellular policy validating its licenses in 2004, through ASAF, 2004 provided a new compensation that was in addition to the charges provided by (mobile) service providers. Paid under your current license. In paragraph 4 of the said policy it was assumed that there was a reasonable operational cost for licensing and management of the license and that the frequency used for spectrum use since 1998 was using the spectrum, which Was completely different and different. PTA's responsibility for Spectrum Management, Ensuring Licensing and Policing for a
