Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Revision No. 19 of 19811 decided on 21st February, 1981.
‑‑‑‑S. 115‑Question of fact decided by a court on proper evidence, held, cannot be questioned in Revision Petition. [Question of fact].
Kh. M. Zia Nayyar for Petitioner.
The present petition is directed against the judgment of Mr. Abdul Qadir Shad, the learned Civil, Judge Rawalpindi of 30.6‑1979 dismissing the suit of the present petitioner, as also against the judgment of Mr. Abdul Razzak Sheikh, the learned Additional. District Judge, Rawalpindi of 17‑11‑1980 dismissing the appeal.
2. The question involved before the two Courts was whether the land in question was a street. The Courts on' examining the evidence came to the conclusion that it was a public street. Reliance wad placed on a map sanctioned in 1938 and also on a sale deed of 1944 which showed the existence of the street. The matter was within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and the appellate Courts and it cannot be said that in exercise of their jurisdiction the Court to have committed any irregularity or illegality. The question of fact decided by the Courts on proper evidence cannot be questioned in the Revision Petition.
3. Under these circumstances I find no force in this Revision petition. It is dismissed.
M.Y.M. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer