Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED FAYYAZ HUSSAIN HAMDANI, ADVOCATE versus THE STATE


Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan was accused of misunderstanding in the first information report and there was no basis for stopping the process of stopping it [first information report].

1982 P Cr. L J 726

[Lahore]

Before Abaid Ullah Khan, J

Syed FAYYAZ HUSSAIN HAMDANI, ADVOCATE-Petitioner

versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Writ Petition No. 6995 of 1980, decided on 4th October, 1980.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---

-- Art. 199-Allegation contained in First Information Report misconceived and had no footing to stand upon-Proceedings quashed.-[First Information Report].

Petitioner in person.

Mahmud-ul-Haq Thanvi for the State.

JUDGMENT

This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution for quashing the investigation proceedings initiated against the petitioner on the basis of First Information Report No. 268 registered at police station Old Anar kah, Lahore on the 15th January, 1980, arises out of the following circumstances. Syed Fayyaz Hussain Hamdani, an Advocate of this Court the petitioner, inspected the record relating to his Plot No. 744, Shadman Colony, Lahore, in the office of the Lahore Development Authority on the 29th July, 1979. On the 2nd August, 1979 he filed a certified copy of a power of attorney purported to have been executed by him in favour of one Chaudhri Muhammad Ashiq on the 12th November, 1972. He contended that he had not actually executed the said power of attorney. He executed document of revocation of the said power of attorney on the 31st July, 1979, and got it registered the same day. In the certified copy of the power of attorney which he filed in the office of the Lahore Develop ment Authority on 2nd August, 1979, there was a note at the end that the said document had been cancelled vide the deed of revocation hearing registration No. 4839 dated the 1st August, 1979. The office of the Lahore Development Authority formed the view that these words had been added by the petitioner in an attempt to committing forgery and lodged the First Information Report referred to in the beginning of this order.

2. The petitioner maintained, and this fact cannot be controverted by the learned counsel appearing for the State that the words which he has been blamed for adding at the end of certified copy of the power of attorney were actually written by the copying agency on the basis of endorsement made by the registering authorities and that he had not added any word thereto. He has also produced another certified copy of the power of attorney which contains these words added by the registering authorities themselves. In these circumstances the registration of case by the Lahore Development Authority against the petitioner was misconceived B and had no footing to stand upon. Consequently, the proceedings of the case are quashed.

Proceedings quashed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Makli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.