Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHAIR DIN versus THE STATE


Section 526 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) refuses to submit questions to the trial magistrate prosecutor's witness for its authenticity and credit applicants, which it is held that he is a magistrate. There will be no justice. By some other court, for cases to be heard, matters

1982 P Cr. L J 346

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

KHAIR DIN-Petitioner

versus

THE STATE- Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 166-T of 1981, decided on 28th November, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-- S. 526-Transfer of criminal case-Trial Magistrate disallowing petitioner to put questions to a prosecution witness with a view to impeach his veracity and credit-Petitioner, held, given reasonable apprehension in mind that he would not get justice from Magistrate-Cases transferred, for trial by some other Court, in circumstances.

Muhammad Abdullah Bajwa for Petitioner.

M. D. Chaudhary for the State.

Date of hearing : 28th November, 1981.

JUDGEMENT

This is a petition under section 526, Cr. P. C. by Khair Din, petitioner, for the transfer of four criminal cases which are pending against him in the Court of Mr. Sardar Ali Gorsi, Judicial Magistrate, Lahore and one other which is pending against Yousuf Gil, which is also pending in the same Court (and which five cases are being heard together on the same day by virtue of an order passed by this High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 66-T/81, to some other Court.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Mr. M. A., Lone was a witness in the four cases which are pending against the petitioner and when he was put questions to impeach his veracity and credit, the trial Magistrate disallowed the said questions in each case and thus debarred the petitioner from proving that the testimony of the said witness could not be relied upon.

3. The report of the learned trial Magistrate, which has been received, shows that the said allegation has been admitted as correct. At this stage, I would not like to state whether the said questions put to Mr, M. A. Lone, witness, to impeach his veracity and credit, were im properly disallowed, and, if so, what is its effect, for that is a matter which must be left to the trial Magistrate to decide, but the refusal of the trial Magistrate to allow the petitioner to put questions to M. A. Lone to im peach his veracity and credit has given a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that he will not get justice from the trial Magistrate. In these circumstances, I would transfer all these five cases presently pending in the Court of Mr. Sardar Ali Gorsi, Judicial Magistrate, Lahore, to some other competent Magistrate at Lahore, to be nominated by the Sessions Judge, Lahore, for disposal in accordance with the earlier direction of this Court given in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 66-T/81.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Chicha watni lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.