Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALLAH BAKHSH versus DEPUTY SEC. (GENERAL), FOOD DEPTT.


Article 199 reads with the West Pakistan Food Stuffs Distribution Order, 1967, considering the distribution of section 6 of the ration depot by the District Food Controller, against which such order has been given by the Department of Food. Dismissing the certified authority, the review petition filed by the applicant is not disposed of by the competent authority and it is deemed that the applicant by the Secretary of State for Food under the Punjab Government Food Law Act. After being given the opportunity to listen to the law is at your disposal Latva is.

P L D 1982 Lahore 575

Before Irshad Hassan Khan, J

ALLAH BAKHSH‑Petitioner

versus

DEPUTY SECRETARY (GENERAL), FOOD DEPARTMENT

AND

5 others‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 234 of 1979, decided on 25th April, 1982.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 199 read with West Pakistan Foodstuffs Distribution Order, 1967, S. 6‑Bifurcation of Ration Depot by District Food Controller‑Revision petition against such order dismissed by Deputy Secretary of Food Department in purported exercise of his power as revisional authority‑Held, revision petition filed by petitioner not disposed. of by competent authority and same deemed to be pending for disposal by Secretary to Government of Punjab Food Department in accordance with law after providing opportunity of being heard to petitioner.

Khawaj Din v. Rationing Controller, Food, Faisalabad and 2 others P L D 1980 Lah. 15 ref.

Nawab Saeed Ullah Khan for Petitioner.

Rashid Aziz Addl. A: G. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 5.

Farooq Hasan Naqvi for Sh, Hamid Mukhtar for Respondent No. 6.

Date of hearing : 25th April, 1982.

JUDGEMENT

The dispute in this case relates to bifurcation of the depot of the petitioner by order dated 21‑5‑1978 of the District Food Controller, Sargodha.

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order of bifurcation was passed without any show‑cause notice to the petitioner. The appeal filed by the petitioner before the Additional Commissioner (Revenue; was dismissed as incompetent and the Deputy Secretary (General) to the Food Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, acting as revisional authority dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the order of District Magistrate, Sargodha was justified on merits and that the defect in not hearing the petitioner at the original stage 'stood cured in appeal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Deputy Secretary (General) was not competent to pass the impugned order in the purported exercise of his power as revisional authority and the Secretary to the Food Department, Government of Punjab, alone was competent to exercise revisional jurisdiction under Article 6 of the West Pakistan Foodstuff Distribution Order, 1967 (hereinafter called the order). Reliance is placed on Khawaj Din v. Rationing Controller, Food, Faisalabad and 2 others P L D

1980 Lah. 15, where it was held that the use of word "Government" in the context of Article 6(3) of the Order would mean Government acting through the Secretary of the Depart' and the delegation or assigning of power of hearing and adjudication on revision petition by the Secretary to the Deputy Secretary (General) was without lawful authority.

3. I am inclined to agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision petition filed by the

disposed of by the competent authority. The result is that the same is deemed to be ‑pending and shall be disposed of by the Secretary to the Government of the Punjab, Food Department, Lahore in accordance with law and after providing an opportunity of being beard to the petitioner. The writ petition is accepted to this extent with no order as to costs.

S' Q' Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.