Find a Lawyer

WAHID BAKHSH WATTOO versus PAK AMERICAN FERTILIZERS LIMITED

Article 25 End of Fertilizer Plant on Exit Economic Dissociation Scheme (VSS) - Offer 1 + 2 Benefit to Workers of Such Plant Petitioners Offered Under the Golden Handshake Scheme (GHSS) Of the two sisters' concerns about the 1 + 4 benefit claim respondent company, Waldity Response Company offered VSS instead of adopting a way to retrieve applicants \ Applicants with much lower benefits Vendors voluntarily chose the VSS offered by the defendant company and prior to the introduction of the Golden Handshake Had the benefits. The scheme concerns two sisters, the Voluntary Separation Scheme and the Golden Handshake Scheme were two independent schemes that were introduced at different times and applied to applicants for the benefit of two different sets of workers in different situations at two different companies. Offering was not discriminated against. The discrimination ratio GHSS / VSS was charged by only 65 W orkers (applicants), but not by other workers who were satisfied with the VSS. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the constitutional application be dismissed under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• ACTION TAKEN ON NEWS CLIPPING DATED 4-6-2013, PUBLISHED IN DAILY JANG, AGAINST THE PARLIAMENTARIANS 2014 SCMR 98
• SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING ILLEGAL SELLING OUT THE AUQAF PROPERTIES BY THE CHAIRMAN EVACUEE TRUST PRO 2014 PLD 100
• Raja RAB NAWAZ v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 101
• WUKALA MAHAZ BARAI TAHAFAZ DASTOOR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 111
• Dr. IMRAN KHATTAK v. Ms. SOFIA WAQAR KHATTAK, PSO TO CHIEF JUSTICE 2014 SCMR 122
• ACTION AGAINST DISTRIBUTION OF DEVELOPMENT FUNDS BY EX-PRIME MINISTER RAJA PARVAIZ ASHRAF 2014 PLD 131
• Ms. SALMA MOOSAJEE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 135
• RUSTAM v. AURANGZEB 2014 SCMR 146

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocate from Jhang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes