Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAFAAT ALI versus S. H. O., SADDAR POLICE STATION, KARACHI


The possibility of a hearing before the opening of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 section 14 history sheet, the opening principle of natural justice, the notice of principle or the history sheet].

1982 P Cr. L J 703

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Hayee Kureshi Actg. C. J. and K. A. Ghani, J

SHAFAAT ALI-‑Petitioner

versus

S. H. O., SADDAR POLICE STATION, KARACHI‑Respondent

Constitutional Petition No. D‑548 of 1981, decided on 17th September, 1981.

Sind Crimes Control Act (IV of 1975)‑--

---S. 14‑--History sheet, opening of‑Natural justice, principles, of‑Show‑cause notice or opportunity of hearing not given before opening of history sheet‑Such action, held, against principles of natural justice‑Order quashed.‑[Natural justice, principle of].

Ameer Ahmed Khan for Petitioner.

Mohammad Ibrahim Memon A. A.‑G. for Respondent.

Date of hearing :17th September, 1981.

JUDGMENT

ABDUL HAYEE KURESHI, ACTG. C. J.

‑The case of the petitioner is that he is a respectable shopkeeper and he is being .harassed by the respondent who had taken action against him under section 14 of the Sind Crimes Control Act. It is also stated in the petition that on 23rd May, 1981 the respondent called the petitioner to the police station to enter his name in the Register maintained at the police station for history sheeters. The main ground urged in support of this petition is that such history sheet has been opened without any show‑cause notice or hearing.

2. No counter affidavit has been filed but the comments submitted by the respondent were produced in Court by the Additional Advocate‑General to day. In the comments while the respondent has denied that he called the petitioner to the police station be has stated that the history sheet of the petitioner was opened on 14th October, 1978 by the predecessor of the Station House Officer who is not holding charge at present. Even in these comments it is not stated that any show‑cause notice of hearing was given to the petitioner before opening the history sheet.

3. The action of opening of the history sheet of the petitioner is violative of the principles of natural justice and for such reasons we quash the order of the opening of history sheet of the petitioner and declare it to be of no lawful authority and of no legal effect. It shall however be open to the respondent to take fresh action after complying with the statutory rules and the principles of natural justice.

4. This petition stands disposed of in terms of the above order. The respondent shall bear the costs of the petition.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.