Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFI versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), SARGODHA


R4 () jurisdiction is pending before the Assistant Collector Grade O Helle, automatically transferred to the Assistant Commissioner / Collector's file at the expiry of 60 days and vacated with the jurisdiction to deal with the Assistant Collector.

1981 S C M R 1181

Present: Karam Elahee Chauhan and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ

MUHAMMAD RAFT Ere. Appellants

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REV.), SARGODHA

ETC.-Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 419 of 1975, decided on 25th November, 1980.

(On appeal from order of Lahore High Court, dated 28th May, 1979 in Writ Petition No. 2823 of 1979).' '

Land Reforms (Procedure for Ejectment Suits) Rules, 1977-

--R. 4(5)--Jurisdiction--Case pending before Assistant Collector Grade I-Held, automatically stood transferred to file of Assistant Commissioner/Collector on expiry of 60 days and Assistant Collector devoid of jurisdiction to deal with case.-[Jurisdiction].

M. Ahmed Hasan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court assisted by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.

Abid Nawaz, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No. 2.

Pate of hearing : 25th November, 1980.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.

-This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the judgment of Lahore High Court dated 28-5-1979 dismissing Writ Petition No. 2823 of 1975 filed by the petitioners. By the Writ Petition, the petitioners sought to challenge the order of the Additional Commissioner (Revenue), Sargodha dated 22-5-1979 whereby he allowed revision application of the respondents Nos. 2 to 5 and directed the Assistant Commissioner/Collector to decide the ejectment suit between the parties, afresh, according to law.

The High Court noticed the fact that Assistant Collector Grade 1 Sargodha had decided the case before him after the maximum period o 60 days prescribed in this behalf, and according to rule 4 (5) of the Punjab Land Reforms (Procedure for Ejectment Suits) Rules, 1977 the case, on the expiry of 60 days stood automatically transferred to the file of the Assistant Commissioner/Collector and consequently, the order of the Assistant, Collector be, without jurisdiction, the case is deemed to be pending before Assistant's Commissioner and this was indeed the effect of the order impugned before the High Court.

The legal position pointed out by the High Court that must prevail o the facts of this case is unassailable; the learned counsel for the petitioners to the contrary pointed indeed nothing out to us.

There is, therefore, no merit in this petition and it is dismissed in limine,

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Besham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.