Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus NASIM AKHTAR


Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) Denial of personal need of the tenant

1981SCMR979(1)

Present : Muhammad Afzal Zu11ah and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ

Sh. MUHAMMAD RIAZ--Petitioner

versus

Mst. NASIM AKHTAR AND OTHERS-Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 394 of 1981, decided on 19th April, 1981.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 9-2-1981, passed in S. A. O. No. 565 of 1975).

West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)-

S. 13(3)(a)(ii)--Eviction of tenant--Personal requirement Mere ownership of property in same urban area-Held, by itself no ground to refuse landlord's application for eviction of his tenant on ground of personal requirement.

Muhammad Sharif Butt, Advocate and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate-on Record for Petitioner.

Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 19th April, 1981.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-

-Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment dated 9-2-1981 of the Lahore High Court whereby a Second Appeal, arising out of an eviction order passed by a learned Rent Controller, filed by the respondent-landlords was allowed on the ground of bona fide require ment. Earlier, the First Appellate Court while allowing the petitioners appeal had set aside the eviction order.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two contentions in support of this petition: (1) that none of the witnesses examined from the respondents' side deposed about bona fide requirement; and (2) that the landlords owned other property in the same urban area.

Mere ownership of property in the same urban area is by itself not ground to refuse the application of the landlord for eviction of his tenant on ground of personal requirement. With regard to the evidence led from the respondents' side, suffice it to observe that the copies of the depositions on the witnesses have not been placed on record so as to verify the statement made by the learned counsel with regard to the contents thereof.

We accordingly find no force in this petition and the same is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.