Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SADIQ MOHY-UD-DIN versus SECRETARY, DISTRICT ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE


Section 5 Delays law has well settled that no appeal can be filed in any court like the case at hand, the question of filing an inter-court appeal with good faith, under the circumstances, is not available. And therefore there is no good reason for it. Delay [Intro Court Appeal]
1981SCMR817

Present : Karam Elahee Chauhan and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ

SADIQ MOHY.UD-DIN- Petitioner

versus

SECRETARY, DISTRICT ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE

AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 577 of 1976, decided on 26th November, 1980.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 27th April, 1976 in I.C.A. 33/76).

Limitation Act (IX of 1908)-

---S. 5-Condonation of delay-Law well settled that no inter- Court appeal could be filed in cases like case in hand-Question of filing inter-Court appeal in good faith, in circumstances, held, does not arise and as such no sufficient cause existed for condonation of delay.-[Intro-Court appeal].

Malik Ahmad Khan v. Iqbal 1975 S C M R 275 ref.

Ch. Zamir Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Abdul

Karim, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.

Mian Saeed-ur-Rehman, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Salahufdin, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 25th November, 1980,

ORDER

KARAM ELAHBB CHAUHAN, J.

-This is a petition against an order of a Division Bench of the High Court dated 27th April, 1976, whereby an Inter Court Appeal filed by the petitioner was held as incompetent under the law relevant in this respect. The High Court in support of its view relied upon Malik Ahmad Khan v. Iqbal 1975 S C M R 275. When confronted with the above precedent the learned counsel conceded that the order of the Division Bench was correct and that be does not challenge the same as such.

2. However, he submitted that this should be treated as a petition for leave to appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge (which was challenged in 1. C. A.) dated 13th February, 1976 whereby his Writ Petition No. 773/75 was dismissed. It may be mentioned that in this respect the petition would be barred by 51 days. Learned counsel has prayed that the delay may be condoned because the petitioner had pursued the remedy of the Inter Court Appeal in good faith and the time spent therein should be allowed towards counting the limitation in the

present petition.

3. We are afraid that the request cannot be acceded to in the face of the judgment of this Court in Malik Ahmad Khan v. Iqbal which already existed in the field much prior to the institution of the Inter Court Appeal and which with little diligence could have been noticed by all concerned, for the proposition that no Inter-Court Appeal in this case could be filed. In these circumstances, the question of filing the Inter-Court Appeal in good faith does not arise and as such there exists so sufficient cause for condonation of delay.

4, The result is that this petition has no merit and is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Wazirabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.