Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAULA BAKHSH versus CHAIRMAN., FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, RAWALPINDI


Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Appraising Tribunal's decision on a fact-based question is a challenge to the High Court only when there is no evidence, the High Court, in its unusual jurisdiction, does not hold the Appellate Court position. And will work on the definition of evidence.

1981 C L C 694

[Quetta]

Before Mir Khuda Bakhsh Marri, C. J. and Abdul Qadeer

Chaudhry, J

MAULA BAKHSH AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

HAIRMAN FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION

RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 94 of 1979, decided on 27th December, 1979.

(a) Legislation‑

‑‑ Retrospectively‑Law‑giver authorised to give law taking away rights of citizens with retrospective effect‑Legislature, held, also empowered to amend law in such a way as to disturb judgments of Courts‑Courts have to interpret law as it stands and cannot assume jurisdiction exclusively vesting in Legislature.

Sardar Ashiq Muhammad Khan Mazari v. Chairman, Federal Land Commission, Islamabad P L D 1977 Lah. 461; Adnan Afzal v. Capt. Sher Afzal P L D 1969 S C 187; Hotel Industries (Private) Ltd., Lahore v. Province of West Pakistan through The Secretary, Excise and Taxation Department, Lahore and another P L D 1978 Lah. 53; Mian Rafi‑ud‑Din and others v. The Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner and others P L D 1971 S C 252; Commissioner of Sales Tax, Karachi v. Alessrs Krudd Sons Ltd. P L D 1974 S C 18; Islamic Republic of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Local Government, Islamabad v. Mazhar‑ul‑Haq and others 1977 S C M R 509 and Rooh Afza v. Muhammad Umar and others P L D 1978 Pesh. 1 ref.

(b) Land Reforms Regulation (Validation of Orders) Ordinance (XXIX of 1978)‑‑

‑‑ Retrospectively of legislation‑Ordinance XXIX of 1978, held, only a procedural law and applies retrospectively.‑[Burden of proof].

Adnan Afzal v. Capt. Sher Afzal P L D 1969 S C 187 ref.

(e) Evidence Act (I of 1872)‑

‑‑ S. 106‑Burden of proof‑Order challenged on ground of mala fide Onus, held, lies upon person levelling such allegation.‑[Burden of proof ].

(d) Legislation‑

‑‑ Authority of Legislature Cannot be challenged on ground of mala fides.

(e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 199‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑Appreciation of evidence Decision on question of fact by competent Tribunal‑Challengeable before High Court only in cases of no evidence‑High Court, held, would not sit as Appellate Court in its extraordinary jurisdiction and embark upon appreciation of evidence.‑[Evidence].

Munawar Mirza and M. Riaz for Petitioners.

Advocate‑General (Baluchistan) for Respondents.

Dates of hearing : 26th November and 27th December, 1979.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Hyderabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.