Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MESSRS HOUSING ENTERPRISE versus MST. RABIA BEGUM


Section 30 of the Workers' Compensation Act 1923 read with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968); the order of the Commissioner under Section O10B cannot be presented to the Section 10A Labor Appellate Tribunal.

1981 PLC622

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind]

Present : Z. A. Channa, Appellate Tribunal

MESSRS HOUSING ENTERPRISE

Versus

Mst. RABIA BEGUM

Appeal No: WCK‑3 of 1981, heard on 5th March, 1981.

Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923)‑

‑‑‑ S. 30 read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial em ployment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O 10‑B---Order of Commissioner under S. O. 10‑B‑‑Not appealable before Labour Appellate Tribunal.

M. A. Hasan for Appellant.

Date of hearing : 5th March, 1981.

DECSION

This purports try be an appeal under section 30 of .the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against an order passed by the learned Com missioner for Workmen's Compensation (East Division), on 10th December, 1969, awarding an amount of Rs. 15,000 as group insurance com pensation under Standing Order 10‑B to the heirs of an ex‑employee of the appellant‑Company, Mohammad Ahmad Siddiqui, who died on 3rd June, 1976, while in the employment of the appellant‑Company, which is engaged in construction work. This amount was awarded by the learn ed Commissioner as the deceased admittedly was not insured by the appellant‑Company in the manner as provided under Standing Order 10‑B.

2. It has been repeatedly held by this Tribunal that no appeal lies to it against an order passed by a Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation under Standing Order 10‑B. The latest decision in this behalf is in the case of Karachi Transport Corporation v. Maula Bux and another, decided on 18th February, 1981.

3. As the appeal filed by the appellant is not maintainable, it is dis missed to limine,

Appeal dismissed,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.