Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Writ Petition No. 8963 of 1980, decided on 24th August, 1980.
------S. 21 (h)‑Election‑Disqualification‑Any amount payable by respondent to Municipal Committee on account of contract ending 30th June, 1980, held, cannot be regarded as being a pecuniary interest in affairs of Municipal Committee warranting disqualification under S.21(h).
‑‑ Art. 199 and Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979), Ss. 21 (h) & 24‑Election‑‑‑Writ of quo warranto‑Can only be filed if a person is disqualified to hold a public office‑Only Election Tribunal under law can give a finding that election of a returned candidate invalid‑Petitioner could not file election petition because he was not an opposing candidate‑Election of respondent, held, neither challenge able by petitioner nor by a mode other than that of filing an election petition.
Hamida Begum and others v. Provincial Election Authority and others P L D 1966 Lab. 560 ref.
A. W. Butt for Petitioner.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer