Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM QURESHI versus MRS. MOEENA HIDAYATULLAH

The Court of Appeal granted a writ of appeal to the jurisdiction of the Articles of Pakistan Arts ? (185 ()) and 199 ? High Court for the purpose of examining the arguments of the applicant as far as the findings of fact are concerned. The controller and the terms of section 21 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 in the First Appellate Court were the final authority to record such results, and under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court had any question of exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. Was not open to do.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• Syed MUBASHIR RAZA JAFFRI v. EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTIONS (EOBI) 2014 SCMR 949
• Syed NAZIR GILLANI v. PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY 2014 PLC(CS) 961
• Haji RAUF v. ABDULLAH QAISER 2014 SCMR 979
• Syed NAZIR GILLANI v. PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY 2014 SCMR 982
• WAHID BAKHSH BALOCH v. State 2014 SCMR 985
• FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Customs, Board of Revenue, Islamabad 2014 SCMR 994
• FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD v. AMNA AFRIDI 2014 SCMR 1003
• SHAHID AHMED v. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. 2014 SCMR 1008

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes