Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus KHUSHAL MUHAMMAD


Para 14 read the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 144, 91 and 120 Declaration Suit Limitation for the sale of land made prior to settlement and hence the Settlement Commissioner / Board established within 12 years of such sale Following a Remedy Treatment with the Revenue Suite is invalid. And within 3 years of the last order approved by the Board of Revenue, governed by Article 144 Suite, further binding clauses, if Article 120 apply alternatively, are subject to further restrictions.

1981 C L C 1191

[Lahore]

Before Khurshid Ahmad, J

SHAH MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner

versus

KHUSHAL MUHAMMAD Arm 3 others---‑Respondents

Civil Revision No. 514 of 1972, decided on 30th March, 1980.

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----

----S. 9 & O. VII, r. 10‑Jurisdiction‑‑Declaratory suits‑Whether civil Courts have jurisdiction to try suit‑‑‑Averments in plaint alone without reference to defence to be considered for decision of question.‑ [Jurisdiction‑Plaint].

Mst. Zainab v. Fazal Dad P L D 1966 Lah. 1050 rel.

(b) Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, 1956‑---

‑‑ Para. 14, Part I‑Transfer of land by allottees ‑‑Settlement fee not paid‑Allotted property still in compensation pool‑Transactions relating to such property. held, void and to be ignored‑Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), S. 6.

Mst. Habib Khatoon v. Sardar Muhammad P L D 1970 S C 162 ref.

(c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

-----S. 9‑Declaratory suits‑Civil Court‑Jurisdiction‑Averments in plaint challenging no order of Settlement Authority‑Jurisdiction of civil Courts, held, not barred.‑[Jurisdiction].

MR. Ghulam Fatima v. Muhammad Hussain P L D 1976 S C 729 rel.

Mst. Sughran v. Rehmat Ali P L D 1965 Lah. 580 distinguished.

(d) Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, 1956‑---

-‑‑ Para. 14 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts. 144, 91 & 120‑Declaratory suits‑Limitation for‑Sale of land made before permanent settlement and therefore void‑Petitioners pursuing remedies before Settlement Commissioner/Board of Revenue‑Suit instituted within 12 years of such sale and within 3 years of last order passed by Board of Revenue, held, governed by Art. 144‑Suit, held further, still within limitation if Art. 120 made applicable alternatively.

Abdur Rahman v. Abdul Hag P L D 1960 Kar. 625 ; F. A. Khan v. Government of Pakistan P L D 1964 S C 520 and Jumman Khan v. Muhammad Khan 1975 S C M R 289 rel.

Ch. Qadir Bakhsh for Petitioner.

Ch. Hamiduddin for Respondents.

Date of hearing ; 15th March, 1580.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Yazman Mandi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.