Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BEGUM MUSSARAT SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN versus MAQBOOL ABMAD


Section 13 (2) (i) read with the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 30 default Additional District Judge finding out about payment of rent, in relation to a particular period. Has been made but it is stated that the payment of the rent thereafter till the date of the institution of application is also, under the payment or tender, an error of the Additional District Judge which has been decided and is not incomplete.

1981 C L C 1037

[Lahore]

Before Munawwar Elahee Rana, J

BEGUM MUSSARAT SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN‑ Appellant

versus

MAQBOOL AHMAD‑Respondent

Second Appeal from Original Order No. 47 of 1974, decided on 7tb February, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑--------

------S. 13 (2) (i) read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 30‑Default‑Additional District Judge giving finding as to payment of rent having been made in respect of a certain period but not stating if rent for subsequent period till date of institution of application also paid or tendered within time, such omission of Additional District Judge, held, shows whole dispute having not been decided and his decision incomplete.

(b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑--

‑‑ Read with West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, (VI of 1959), S. 13‑S. 30‑Notice‑Question of law and fact‑Question whether fresh notice demanding further rent from date of service of first notice a condition precedent and whether such notice served on respondent‑Held, a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be allowed to be raised for first time in second appeal.‑[Question of fact‑Second appeal].

Afaquz Zubair v. Muhammad Idris P L D 1978 Kar. 984 ref.

(c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑-----

‑‑‑ S. 13 (6) read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Reha bilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958). S. 30‑Deposit of rent in Court -Payment in compliance of order passed under S. 13 (6) of Ordinance VI of 1959, held, cannot be deemed to be payment under notice of demand under S. 30 of Act XXVIII of 1958.

Malik Muhammad Afzal for Appellant.

Sher Zaman Khan for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 5th February, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Hazro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.