NIAZ AHMAD versus NOORULLAH

O xxxxx, r and the order issued by the appellate court counsel to deal with the parties seeking a review in section 115 should not be disturbed unless the defendant's possession is disturbed. Was not ordered to be heard by the court and finally disposed of. According to the orders dated March 31, 1981

1981 C L C 843

[Lahore]

Before Aamer Raza A. Khan, J

Molvi NIAZ AHMAD‑.Petitioner

versus

Molvi N00RULLAH AND 07 HERS‑Respondents

Civil Revision No. 572 of 1979, decided on 1st October, 1980

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑-

‑‑ O. XXXIX, r. I and S. 115‑Revision against order of injunction issued by appellate Court‑Counsel for parties agreeing that petition be disposed of with direction that possession of respondent be not disturbed till final disposal of suit and trial Court directed to hear and finally dispose of suit by 31st March, 1981‑Orders accord ingly.

Syed Shahid H. Qadir for Petitioner.

Ch. Muhammad Sadiq for Respondents

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

best law firm from Rajanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team