Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus BEGUM BILQEES NAZIR AHMED


The defense, section 13 (6), dismisses the argument that the tenants generally misrepresent the directive for the order to receive the rent by the 15th day, too late in the day, such as The question was solved ten years before the judicial view. Informing the client of the provisions of section 13 (6) [Visual Chatomul Khilnani v. Ali Bakhsh and Others PLD 1978 C-521 and Sarfraz Khan v. Mohammad Abdul Rauf PL-1969 C 176 are not applicable] [Advice and Client]

1981 C L C 771

[Lahore]

Before Aftab Hussain, J

MUHAMMAD USMAN (REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS)‑‑

Appellant

versus

BEGUM BILQEES NAZIR AHMED‑Respondent

Second Appeal from Original Order No. 65 of 1972, decided on 25th June, 1979.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑‑ S. 13(6) ‑ Defence, striking off ‑ Contention that tenants normally misconstrue direction for deposit of rent treating order for deposit by 15th‑Held, taking of such plea now too late in the day Such question resolved by judicial precedents about ten years ago Duty of counsel to inform client about provisions of S. 13(6)‑[Visumal Chatumal Khilnani v. Ali Bakhsh and others P L D 1978 Kar. 521 and Sarfraz Khan v. Muhammad Abdul Rauf P L D 1969 Kar. 176 held not applicable]‑[Counsel and client].

Visumal Chatumal Khilnani v. Ali Bakhsh and others P L D 1968 Kar. 521 and Sarfraz Khan v. Mohammad Abdul Rauf P L D 1969 Kar. 176 held not applicable.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑ S. 13(6)‑Defence, striking off‑Appellant filing reply to application under S. 13(6) changing grounds before Rent Controller and District Judge‑‑Held, not possible to believe contention of appellant in circumstances of case.

(c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑

‑‑ S. 15 (4). Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) and Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5‑Second appeal‑Appeal filed without certified copy of order of Rent Controller‑‑‑Such copy not filed within period of limitation nor application under S. 5, Limitation Act filed‑Appeal, held, barred by time in circumstances of case.

Jariullah Khan for Appellant.

Ehsanul Haq Chaudhry for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 25th June, 1979.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Sambrial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.