Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Revision No. 624 of 1973, decided on 16th December, 19813.
‑‑ S. 21‑Award, challenge to‑Estoppel ‑Parties in pending case consenting to refer matter to arbitration, signing proceedings, and award subsequently submitted‑Parties, held, estopped from questioning validity of award on ground of reference having not strictly been made m compliance with provisions of S. 21 and no application having been made in writing‑Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 115.‑‑[Estoppel Award].
Mahabir v. Manohar Singh A I R 1924 All. 540; Waliullah v. Bbaggan A I R 1925 Oudh 269 ; Nldamurthi Karishnamoorthy and another v. Garlgipard Gana pathilingam A I R 1917 Mad. 656; Ghulam Khan v. Muhammad Hassan 29 I A 51 (P C); Ve. N. K. R. M. A. Venkatachellam Chettiar v. Ve. N. K. A. Ramanathan Chettiar etc. A I R 1922 Mad. 429 ; Parsotam Das etc. v. Jagan Nath and others A I R 1919 All. 381 ; Jaimal Singh v. Tib Ram A I R 1930 Lah. 523 Messrs S M. Qasim & Co. v. Messrs Sh. Ziauddin P L D 1062 Lah. 95.
Pakistan through Director of Storage and Inspection (Food grains), Ministry of Agriculture and Works, Karachi v. Chaudhry Brothers Ltd., Lahore P L D 1978 Kar. 362 and Jagmohan v. Suraj Narain A I R 1935 Oudh 499 ref.
‑ S. 30‑Award, setting aside of‑Arbitrator framing issues and parties knowing subject‑matter of suit having been referred to arbitration Award, held, could not be knocked down on ground of reference having been vague or invalid‑[Jumma Khan etc. v. Mahmud Khan etc. 1973 S C M R 2E9 held not applicable].‑[Award].
Jumma Khan etc. v. Mahmud Khan etc. 1973 S C M R 289 held not applicable.
S. 30‑Award, setting aside of‑Arbitrator considering all evidence, documents, and arguments of parties‑Award cannot be set aside such case on any technical ground‑Conditions necessary for setting aside award: misconduct of Arbitrator and award being result of corruption‑No such condition having been proved, award, he could not beset aside‑[Award].
Safia Bai etc. v. Karachi Co‑operative Housing Societies Union Ltd. P L D 1967 Kar, 598 ref.
Farooq Bedar for Petitioner.
Respondent No. 1 : Ex parse.
S. M. Wahab for Respondent No. 2.
Date of hearing : 7th December, 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer