Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAKINA BEGUM versus SURAT BIBI


Possibility to insist on the submission of a section 22 security legislative repository or the delivery of security by offer

1981 C L C 398

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Afzal Lone, J

Mst. SAKINA BEGUM‑Defendant/Appellant

versus

Mst. SURAT BIBI‑Respondent

Regular Second Appeal No. 1043 of 1965, decided on 9th July, 1980.

(a) Punjab Pre‑emption Act (I of 1913)‑

‑‑ S. 22‑Deposit of security‑Legislature's object in insisting upon deposit or furnishing of security by a pre‑emptor‑To safeguard vendee against frivolous proceedings on pact of prospective pre emptors.

(b) Punjab Pre‑emption Act (I of 1913)‑

‑‑ S. 22(5) (a)‑Dismissal of appeal for withdrawal of one‑fifth amount‑Appellate Court may direct appellant to make deposit at any time before final determination of appeal‑Pre‑emptor‑appellant who on dismissal of his suit withdraws one‑fifth of pre‑emption money would be bound to deposit same in Court only if ordered by Appellate Court but need not volunteer such payment‑Pre‑emptor's appeal cannot be dismissed if no such order made‑Appellant having deposited one‑fifth in trial Court withdrawing same at appellate stage without permission of Court‑Held, would not be immune from action under subsection (5) (a)‑[Paras Ram v. Dulpat Rai A I R 1920 Lab. 46 and Prem Singh v. Lakha Singh and others A I R 1929 Lab. 387 dissented from].‑[Appeal (civil)].

Sanwal Das v. Jaigo Mal and others A 1 R 1924 Lab. 68 fol.

Paras Ram v. Dalpat Rai A I R 1920 Lab. 46 and Prem Singh v. Lakha Singh and others A I R 1929 Lab. 387 dissented from.

Mst. Bibi Aisha v. Shadi Khan A I R 1935 Pesh. 143 ; Khair Din v. Hashmat and others 1974 Law Notes 735 ; Abdul Ghafoor and another v. Mst. Igbal Begum and another 'P L D 1975 Lab. 524 and Ismail and another v. Muhammad Aslam and 2 others P L D 1980 Lab. 104 ref.

(c) Precedents ‑‑‑

Dicta of a Judge‑Held, can lay down authority only for points mooted and discussed in his judgment.

(d) Precedents‑

‑ Pre‑Partition decisions of Lahore High Court‑Not binding on present High Court though entitled to greatest respect.

Muhammad Ahsan Ullah Khan and others v. Muhammad Sami Ullah Khan and others P L D 1964 Lab. 101 ref.

M. Riaz Anwar for Appellant.

M. Pervaiz Akhtar for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 22nd March, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Islamabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.