TALAT HUSSAIN versus RADO BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, KARACHI
Sections 12, 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O IX, R 6 Despite the absence of the preceding injunctions, the defendants failed or failed to appear before the court and had several opportunities to contest the case. In the absence of any defense, the court had no option but to accept the plaintiff's claim that he had booked the suit property to the defendants and Out of the total amount of Rs 5,76,000, Rs 4,76,500 has been paid in connection with the payments. One such defendant also admitted in his letter to the plaintiff in the allotment court's cancellation letter, the plaintiff has been instructed to deposit the balance consideration with his counsel, which will carry out the sale process. And will sign it. All documents relating to the transfer of suit property in favor of the plaintiff and the recording of the statement by the defendants before the relevant sub-registrar were decided accordingly under the decision of the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009