Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Writ Petition No, 2829 of 1980, decided on 6th April, 1980.
------S. 115‑Revision, scope of‑Substantial question, having bearing on merits of suit, decided by judicial approach‑‑Such order amounts to a case decided as contemplated by S. 115‑Application for appointment of a Local Commissioner judicially determined by civil Court‑Held, a case decided for purpose of S. 115‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXVI, r. 9.
Nawabzada Malik Habib U1lah Khan v. The Pak Cement Industries Limited and others 1969 S C M R 965 ; Umar Dad Khan and another v. Tila Muhammad Khan and 14 others P L D .1970 S C 288 and Fazal Muhammad v. Muhammad Usman P L D 1970 Lab. 560 ref.
Bahadur Shah and 2 others v. Sharaf and 9 others P L D 1973 Lab. 513 ; M. J. Sheth & Co. v. Ramiza Bi and another A I R 1938 Mad. 646 ; Sm. Sarala Sundrf Devi and another v. Surgadra Narayan Roy and another 163 I C 449; Jaya Shanker Mills (Barsi) Ltd. v. Hazi Zakaria Hazi Ebrahim A I R 1962 Andh. Pra. 435 ; Akbar Ali Khan v. Harbert Francis A I R 1925 Pat. 125 ; S. R. M. M. Chettley Firm and another v. P. L. N. N. Narayana Chettley A I R 1921 Lower Burma 6 and Somasundaram Chettfar and another v. Manicka Vasaka Desika Gnana Sammanda Prandara Sannidi I L R 3l Mad. 60 fol.
----‑‑ Art. 199 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115‑Writ jurisdic tion‑Order assailed before District Judge suffering from illegality --Such order set aside‑Even if District Judge erred in reaching conclu sion interference by High Court in extraordinary jurisdiction, held, not warranted.
Muhammad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref.
Ch. Moin‑ud‑Din Javed Buttar for Appellant.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer