Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA


Section 115 review, the scope of a substantial question, which deals with the merits of the case, which is decided from a judicial point of view, is the case relating to an order which has been considered by section 115 which is a judicial decision. Defined by a civil court for the appointment of a local commissioner, this case is decided by the purpose of section 115 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A. XXVI, r 9

1981 C L C 361

[Lahore].

Before Muhammad Ilays, J

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑Petitioner

versus

DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No, 2829 of 1980, decided on 6th April, 1980.

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑---

------S. 115‑Revision, scope of‑Substantial question, having bearing on merits of suit, decided by judicial approach‑‑Such order amounts to a case decided as contemplated by S. 115‑Application for appointment of a Local Commissioner judicially determined by civil Court‑Held, a case decided for purpose of S. 115‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXVI, r. 9.

Nawabzada Malik Habib U1lah Khan v. The Pak Cement Industries Limited and others 1969 S C M R 965 ; Umar Dad Khan and another v. Tila Muhammad Khan and 14 others P L D .1970 S C 288 and Fazal Muhammad v. Muhammad Usman P L D 1970 Lab. 560 ref.

Bahadur Shah and 2 others v. Sharaf and 9 others P L D 1973 Lab. 513 ; M. J. Sheth & Co. v. Ramiza Bi and another A I R 1938 Mad. 646 ; Sm. Sarala Sundrf Devi and another v. Surgadra Narayan Roy and another 163 I C 449; Jaya Shanker Mills (Barsi) Ltd. v. Hazi Zakaria Hazi Ebrahim A I R 1962 Andh. Pra. 435 ; Akbar Ali Khan v. Harbert Francis A I R 1925 Pat. 125 ; S. R. M. M. Chettley Firm and another v. P. L. N. N. Narayana Chettley A I R 1921 Lower Burma 6 and Somasundaram Chettfar and another v. Manicka Vasaka Desika Gnana Sammanda Prandara Sannidi I L R 3l Mad. 60 fol.

(b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑---

----‑‑ Art. 199 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115‑Writ jurisdic tion‑Order assailed before District Judge suffering from illegality --Such order set aside‑Even if District Judge erred in reaching conclu sion interference by High Court in extraordinary jurisdiction, held, not warranted.

Muhammad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref.

Ch. Moin‑ud‑Din Javed Buttar for Appellant.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Arifwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.