Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Regular Second Appeal No. 19 of 1980, decided on 4th June, 1980.
S. 22(1).‑Zar‑i‑Panjum‑ Security‑Civil Judge requiring appellant to furnish security instead of directing him to deposit Zar‑i‑Panjum Appellant giving requisite security, held, could not be non‑suited for non‑compliance with direction of trial Court in terms of provision of subsection (1) of S. 22, Punjab Pre‑emption Act, 1913.
‑‑ S. 30 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 10‑Pre‑emption Limitation‑Sale of land made by registered sale‑deed and followed by mutation‑Period of limitation, held to be counted from date of registration of sale‑deed and not from date of sanction of mutation.
Ganga Ram and others v. Sardara and another 64 P L R 1916 distinguished.
Syed Faqir Hussain for Appellant.
Kh. Muhammad Farooq for Respondent No. 1.
Kh. Muhammad Tufall for Respondent No. 2.
Date of hearing : 4th June, 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer