Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Revision No. 26 of 1980, decided on 17th June 1980.
Ss. 10 & 14‑Civii Judge‑ Jurisdiction‑High Court not issuing any notification curtailing jurisdiction of Civil Judge‑Pre‑emption that his jurisdiction extended over entire District‑Any direction issued by High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction authorising Civil Judge to hold Court at a specified place, held, could not override provisions of S. 1C(2) conferring jurisdiction on Civil, Judge over entire District including such specified place.‑[Jurisdiction].
Term "Judge" usually identified with term "Court" and both expressions used interchangeably.
S. 14‑Terms "Court" and "Judge"‑To be construed in context of statutes in which used‑Scheme of Civil Courts Ordinance and heading of S. 14 thereof, held, amply demonstrate term "Court" being identified with its Presiding Officer.‑[Words and phrases].
O. XXI, r. 10 & S. 115‑Execution of decree ordered by Civil Judge allegedly in unusual haste‑Merit of speedy justice though to be appreciated yet tendency to precipitate action could not earn confidence of litigants, such being foundation of a successful judicial system‑Executing Court having jurisdiction, any error in exercise of such jurisdiction, held, can furnish valid ground for interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.
Shamim Abbas Bokhari for Petitioners.
Rana Abdur Rahlm for Respondent No. 1. Nemo for Respondent No. 2.
Date of hearing : 16th March 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer