Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Writ Petition No. 6603 of 1980, decided on 30th September 1980.
--S. 6(2) read with General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 15‑Addi tional Controller‑Appointment of‑Law permitting appointment of a person' to be Additional Controller of rents, Central Government, held, can under S. 15 of General Clauses Act make such appointment also by virtue of office of such person.
‑ S. 10(xiii)‑Executive Officer‑Appointment of‑Contention that law intends Cantonment to be in charge of only one officer designated as Executive Officer and no scope exists for appointment of any Additional Executive Officer‑Held: An Additional Executive Officer cannot be said to be an Executive Officer even though he may be discharging some functions of an Executive Officer.
S. 10(xiii)‑‑Additional Executive Officer‑Appointment of‑Com petency of Federal Government to appoint an Additional Executive Officer, held, cannot be challenged under Cantonment Rent Restriction Act.
Farzand Ali v. Province of West Pakistan P L D 1970 S C 98 ref.
‑‑ S. 22‑Eviction‑Protection froth eviction under S. 22 of Act, held, available to Government servant, in case of eviction being detrimental to public interest.
Muhammad Slddiq Butt for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Fashtd Rahint for Respondent No. 3.
Syed Iftikhar Ahmad Shah, Dy. A.‑G. under direction of Court.
Date of hearing : 24th September 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer