Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PHOOL MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE


Section 13 read with the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), service of difference as a service of notice under section 30 notice, sections 13A and 30, section 13 of Act VI of 1959 Knowledge is considered on the part of A. The tenant as the previous landlord and the obligation to pay the rent to such landlord and to inform the tenant when acting as the new owner, while under section 30 of the 1958 Act 1953, the rent The uprising knows the owner until the PTD notice is issued and it is not worked. It

1981 CLC 179

[Lahore]

Before M. S. H. Qureshi, J

PHOOL MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner

versus

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE AHD 2 OTHERS‑

Respondents

Writ Petition No. 9191 of 1980, decided on 30th September, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑ S. 13‑A read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilita tion) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 30‑‑Notice, service of‑Difference as to service of notice between Ss. 13‑A & 30‑Section 13‑A of Act VI of 1959 presupposes knowledge on part of tenant as to previous landlord and his liability to pay rent to such landlord and notifications of change to tenant when as new owner steps in, whereas under section 30 of Act of 1958, a tenant does riot know owner until upon issuance of P. T. D. notice served on him.

Nazar Hussain v. Adam Shah P L D 1977 Lah. 210 ; E. A. Evans v. Muhammad Ashraf P L D 1964 S C 536 ; Sardar Begum v. Lahore Improvement Trust P L D 1972 Lah. ;458 ; Nazir Ahmad v. K. E. A I R 1936 P C 253 ; Stylo Shoes Ltd. v. Prices Tailors Ltd. 1906 Ch. D 396 and Prem Parkash v. Mohan Lal A 1. R 1943 Lah. 268 ref.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑

S. 13‑A‑Ejectment‑Default in payment of rent‑Landlord mov ing for ejectment for default in payment of rent for a particular period and rent for such period tendered but refused, tenant, held, can have a case and discretion can be exercised in his favour‑Refusal by land lord however can hardly be held to discharge a tenant of his obliga tion to pay rent for subsequent Period and tenant under obligation to pay rent as and when due.

Rehmat Ali v. Khadeja Hakim P L D 1967 Lah. 29 and Yousaf Shah v. Ghulam Jan Khan 1975 S C hi R 464 ref.

Muhammad Zaman 2weshl for Petitioner.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.