GHULAM FATIMA versus AHMAD KHAN

O XLVII, r I review the words - The error or error on the face of the record in O XLVII is clear; Errors that need to be addressed. At the hearing [Review]

[Lahore]

Before M. Mehboob Ahmad, J

Mst. GHULAM FATIMA AND OTHERS‑‑Petitioners

versus

Sufi AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Review Application No. 29‑C in Regular Second Appeal No. 700 of 1964, heard on 8th July 1980.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)_

‑‑ O. XLVII, r. I‑Review‑‑Words mistake or error apparent on face of record' contained in O. XLVII, r. I, C. P. C., held, cannot be given so wide a scope so as to bring within its fold such errors as should have been pointed out at time of hearing.‑[Review].

Qaimey alias Bhola v Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, Bahawalpur Division, Bahawalpur and .3 others P L D 1979 Lah. 535 ref.

Sardar Ataullah for Appellants.

Pir S. A. Rashid for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 8th July 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

how to become a advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team