Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAJID KHAN versus MST. FAREEHA TAHIR

The plot for the specific performance of the Section 12 suit for sale was jointly in the possession of the plaintiff and his sister, after the plaintiff agreed to sell the suit plot to the plaintiff that the settlement amount was owed by the defendant. Because her sister did not consent to the sale of the plot, thus, she was willing to return the interest amount before confirming the offer made by the plaintiff until she had disclosed the evidence presented by the plaintiff. The evidence cannot be investigated by the plaintiff. Deleted in step. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUMTAZ v. State 2009 YLR 1475
• MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. State 2009 YLR 1479
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL SHARIF v. State 2009 YLR 1486
• RAFIQUE AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 1492
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. ZAHID BASHIR 2009 PTD 1499
• KHANJI v. RAMESH 2009 YLR 1501
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD BHATTI v. MUHAMMAD BUX 2009 YLR 1507
• SHAFIQ-UZ-ZAMAN KHAN v. YOUNUS AHMED KHAN 2009 YLR 1511

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Khuzdar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes