Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZAIBUNNISSA versus MUHAMMAD QASSAM


Section 39, CL (H) and Section 44 Guardian leave the court's local premises and seek to remove the ward from the jurisdiction of a minor boy residing in Japan with his father and divorced mother and Family Court cohabitation search and appellate court re-marrying marital advertising rests on minor father's welfare under the personal law section 39, which is the personal status of the minor parent's welfare. Applies to the patrons appointed or declared by the executor or testamentary or other instrument and is applicable Does not fit The provisions of section 44 for natural or defense guardians, which are further excluded, do not apply to the father [Minor Detention]

1981 C L C 1275

[Karachi]

Before G. M. Shah and B. G. N. Kazi, JJ

Mst. ZAIBUNNISSA‑Petitioner

versus

MUHAMMAD QASSAM AND 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 493 of 1978, decided on 23rd Derek 1980.

(a) Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)‑‑-----

------S. 17‑Matters to be considered in appointing guardian‑-----Minor boy ten years old, subject to Mahommadan Law‑‑Mother remarrying stranger‑Mother's appointment as guardian and her custody of minor, held, not consistent with personal law of parties‑‑Further held, however paramount consideration to he given to welfare of minor with reference to matters indicated in subsection (2) of S. 17.‑[Custody of minor].

Muhammad Ramzan v. Mst. Fazal Nishan 1968 S C M R 1435 ; M.M Feroze Begum v. Lt.‑Col. Muhammad Hussain 1978 S C M R 299 ; Rahimullah Choudhry v. Nelali Begum 1974 S C M R 305 ; Bashir Ahmed v. Yst. 1978 S C M R 192 and Zohura Begum v. Maimuna Khatun P L D 1965 Dacca 290 distinguished.

Mst. Zebo and another'v. Mira/ Gul P L D 1952 Pesh. 77 ref.

(b) Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)‑--

---S. 39, cl. (h) & S.44‑Guardian ceasing to reside within local limits of Court and removal of ward from its jurisdiction‑Minor boy s father living in Japan and wishing to carry him there‑‑Mother divorced and remarrying stranger‑Concurrent findings of Family Court and Appellate Court as to minor's remaining in custody of father being in welfare of minor‑Father natural and legal guardian under personal law‑Section 39, held, applies to guardian appointed or declared in Court or guardian appointed by will or other instrument and does not apply to natural or de facto guardians‑Provisions of S. 44, held further, do not apply to father.‑[Custody of minor].

(c) Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)‑---

‑‑ S. 48‑Finality of order made under Act‑Petitioner's suit under S. 7 decided and her appeal against decision also decided‑Court's jurisdiction being exclusive order in such circumstances final‑Petition, held, misconceived.‑[Custody of minor].

Asghar Ali and 3 others v. Haji Khamico and .J others P L D 1976Kar. 659 and Muhammad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref.

Nizam Ahmed for Petitioner.

Ismail Munshl for Respondents.

Dates of hearing : 17th and 18th December, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Swatmingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.