Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LTD

Article 290 While maintaining the application to retain the company, it was a legal requirement that a member or members of a company must be able to file a petition to persuade a company on the basis of persecution and mismanagement. Filing a directional petition against a company that operates one percent of the company's issued capital otherwise would not be enforceable was not an issue that could be easily ignored. This affects the reputation of the company in the business sphere and the principles were not taken lightly.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through, Secretary, Ministry of Health v. AKHTAR ALI KHAN 2009 MLD 486
• MUHAMMAD ZAFFAR SALEEM v. State 2009 YLR 489
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. Mrs. JAMEELA MUMTAZ 2009 CLC 491
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ AHMED KHAN v. IMRAN ABDULLAH 2009 PCrLJ 491
• ABDUL TAUHEED KHAN v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, C.A.A. KARACHI 2009 PLC(CS) 497
• MUHAMMAD HAFIZ NIZAMANI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 499
• ALLAH BACHAYO v. State 2009 PCrLJ 503
• PAK SUZUKI MOTOR CO. LTD. v. MUHAMMAD JUMSHAD SAEED 2009 CLD 503

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes