Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus MEMBER II, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION


Para 29, read with the Progressive Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XIX natural justice, based on the principle of opportunity to hear disputed allegations of disputed allegations on the applicant's oath, Was present with his lawyer during the hearing. The filing of a certificate issued by the Deputy Commissioner of another district confirming that the applicant was on duty at his office. An inappropriate order is valid for the applicant to be approved without a hearing opportunity [Natural Justice, Rule]

1981 C L C 1044

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Hajeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat. JJ

MUSHTAQ AHMED‑Petitioner

versus

MEMBER II, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 2 others--‑ Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. D‑173 of 1977, decided on 2nd September. 1979.

Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑

--‑‑ Para 29, proviso read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIX‑--Natural justice, principle of‑‑Opportunity of hearing-- Counsel for petitioner filing affidavits controverting allegation in impugned order as to petitioner having been present alongwith his counsel during hearing of case‑Petitioner also filing a certificate issued by Deputy Commissioner of another District categorically confirming petitioner having been on duty in his office on date of hearing of case‑Counter affidavit filed on , behalf of respondents penurious‑Affidavits filed by counsel, in circumstances, held, could not be ignored and impugned order liable to be set aside for having been passed without according opportunity of hearing to petitioner. [Natural justice, principle of].

Ismall Memon for Petitioner.

Sabir Hussain Rehmani for Respondent No. 1.

Nemo for the Remaining Respondents.

Date of hearing : 2nd September, 1979

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.