Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZUBEDA AHMAD versus ABDUS SATTAR


Section 13 (2) (1) Section 30 Appellant (Transfer Landlord) read with the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) seeking rent at a rate of Rs. There are two lower courts looking for rent rates. At Rs 1,800 per month, only the respondent is neither responsible for paying the low rate nor paying the tendering rent, regular rent or tender, responsible for the tenant despite the high demand from the landlord.

1981 C L C 1018

[Karachi]

Before Z. C. Valliani, .J

ZUBEDA AHMAD‑Appellant

versus

ABDUS SATTAR‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 69 of 1976, decided on 11th December 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑--

‑‑ S. 13(2)(1) read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabi litation) Act (XXVIII of 1958). S. 30‑Appellant (transferee landlord) demanding rent at rate of Rs. 31.50 through notice under S. 30‑Two lower Courts finding rate of rent at Rs. 18.00 per month only‑Res pondent neither paying nor tendering rent even at lower rate‑Held, liability, to pay or tender rent regularly, lies with tenant irrespective of higher demand by landlord.

Saida Naim Hussain v. Abdul Ghani P 'L D 1976 Kar. 766 Rah‑e‑Manzil Transport v. Muhammad Amin P L D 1968 Kar. 182 rel.

Ashraf‑ud‑Din v. Sabir Hussain 1973 S ‑C M R 309 ; Ghulam Kibrya v. Afzal Ahmad Khan L D 1973 Note 160 at p. 241 and Abdul Khaliq Qureshi v. Saeed Hassan Shah 1979 C L C 118 ref.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑--

‑‑ S. 13 (2) (i) read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100 Default in payment of rent‑Concurrent findings‑Second appeal Respondent (tenant) sending money order for rent up to a certain period but neither paying nor tendering rent thereafter.‑Both lower Courts failing to consider default from such period‑Held, concurrent findings of absence of default by both lower Courts could be interfered with by High, Court.

Muhammad Alam v. Noor Muhammad 973 S C M R 606 ; Begum Bibi v. Abdul Ghani 1980 S C.M R 675 ; Khuda Bukhsh v. Amir 1980 S C M R 760 and Bashir Ahmad v. Mumtaz Begum 1979 C L C 114 ref.

(c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑---

‑‑ S.13 (3) (a) (i) read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 30‑Ejectment of tenant before expiry of protected period‑Appellant (landlord) filing eject ment application on ground of personal and bona fide use within protected period‑Both lower Courts dismissing ejectment appli cation before expiry of protected period‑Held, no reason to inter fere with finding.

1979 S C M R 534 ( ) rel.

1977 S C M R 147 ref.

Munawwar Abbas for Appellant.

S. Y. Khawaja for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 25th November, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Hayatabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.