FATIMA versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, SIND

Paragraph 8 (2) (i) does not precisely decide the question of entitlement, since the tractor exemption is not a tractor registration in the name of the owner and determines the point in the case of the Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930) Other evidence to consider can be considered. , Sections 19 and 20, West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance (XIX of 1965), Section 23

1981 C L C 942

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Hafeez Memon and S. A . Nusrat, J J

Mst. FATIMA‑Petitioner

versus

ADDITIONAL CHEIF LAND COMMISSIONER, SIND

AND 3 OTHERS‑---Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 306 of 1976, decided on 22nd January, 1980.

Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L.R. 115]‑--

‑‑‑ Para. 8 (2) (i)‑Tractor concession‑Mere non‑registration of trac tor in name of owner, held, does not conclusively determine question of entitlement and other evidence can be looked into for determin ing point in issue‑Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), Ss. 19 & 20, West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), S. 23.

Shafi Muhammad v. Federal Land Commission 1979 C L C 91 rel.

Imamali Kazi for Petitioner.

Abbas Farooqui for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 22nd January, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

immigration advocate from Toru lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team