Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMARLAL versus MUHAMMAD SAEED


Section 13 was read with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A XVII, r 1 the Adjudication Appellant Council was engaged in the High Court in K on 26 9 1977 and 29 9 1977 but District J on rent on 28 9 1977 appealed. Denied a request to postpone , Closure of their evidence and the trial closed on 29 29 1977 for arguments: The rent controller dismissed the request to be irrevocable and postponed without the use of mind and the court on 28 9 1977 In the absence of a lawyer, [INAUDIBLE]

1981 C L C 705

[Karachi]

Before Sajjad Ali Shah, J

AMARLAL AND ANOTHER‑Appellants

versus

Moulvi MUHAMMAD SAEED‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 235 of 1978, decided on 11th November, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑S. 13 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XVII, r. 1‑Adjournment‑Appellants' counsel busy in High Court at K on 26‑9‑1977 and 29‑9‑1977 but on 28‑9‑1977 Rent Controller of District J rejecting appellants' application for adjournment, closing their evidence and adjourning case to 29‑9‑1977 for arguments‑Held: Rent Controller rejected request for adjournment unreasonably and without application of mind and sufficient cause existed for counsel's non‑appearance in Court on 28‑9‑1977.‑[Adjournment].

Salamat Bibi and others v. Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, Multan P L D 1966 S C 467 rel.

Baboo Jan Muhammad v. Abdul Ghafoor P L D 1966 S C 461 ref.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑_‑‑‑ S. 13 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLVII, r. 1 Review‑Appellants applying to Rent Controller for review of ex parte order passed on 28‑9‑1977‑Respondent not denying appellant's counsel having been busy in High Court at Karachi on 26‑9‑1977 and 29‑9‑1977‑Held, every justification existed for setting aside ex parte order.‑[Review].

Muhammad Aslam Mirza v. Mst. Khurshid Bagum P L D 1972 Lab. 603 and Abdul Majeed v. Ibrahim P L D 1975 Kar. 238 rel.

(e) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

S. 13 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XVII, r. 1 Appellants obtaining adjournments on two occasions with no objection from respondent and on other two occasions also Rent Controller granting adjournments, accepting reasons therefore‑Held, in such ,circumstances appellants cannot be blamed for seeking adjournment without valid grounds or for delay of progress of proceedings. [Adjournment].

Nooruddin Sarki for Appellants.

Nizam Ahmed for Respondent.

Dates of hearing : 5th and 7th October, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Chitral lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.