Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Execution No. 60 of 1974 in Suit No. 965 of 1953, decided on 15th November, 1980.
‑‑ First Sched, Art. 183 [as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)] read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXI Limitation‑Execution of decree‑Amendment curtailing period of limitation from twelve years to six years‑Not retrospective Decree passed prior to amendment in, 1972 of Article 183‑Period of twelve years previously available, held, continued to be period for execution of such decree notwithstanding execution application having been filed after amendment of 1972.‑[Decree].
Vithal Rao Gopal Rao v. Ramkishan Waman A I R 1961 Bom. 258 ref.
National Bank of Pakistan v. Hyderabad Tando Fazal Bux Service 1980 C L C 1.146 rel.
0. XXI, r. 30‑Execution of decree‑No statutory provision held, places any prohibition or restraint on filing of more than one execution applications for enforcement of decree.‑[Decree].
M. G. Dastgir for the Decree‑Holder.
Abdul Sattar Memon for the Judgment‑Debt.
Date of hearing : 8th November, 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer