Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

TARIQ HUSSAIN versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION


Paris 8 (2) and 28 and the Land Reform Regulation (Verification of Orders) Ordinance (XXIX of 1978), the Target History of the Section 2 Deputy Land Commissioner to place the applicant on 20 additional production index units in the working order. Allows it to maintain up to 20. i2 Member of 1971, Federal Land Commission, however, seeking record of the case and applicant does not have evidence of owning a tractor in such date and consequently approved for any reason, Federal Land Commission of Member Is not entitled to retain the additional territory of. And the legal authority and his allegation of defamation were not denied, the petition challenging his order was rejected.

1981 C L C 41

[Karachi]

Before A. V. Akhund and Muhammad Zahoorul Haq, JJ

Mir TARIQ HUSSAIN‑Petitioner

versus

MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION‑Respondent

Writ Petition No. 425 of 1976, decided on 4th September, 1980.

Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑--

--‑ Pares. 8 (2) & 28 and Land Reforms Regulation (Validation of Orders) Ordinance (XXIX of 1978), S. 2‑‑Deputy Land Commissioner allowing petitioner to retain 2000 additional produce index units for owning an agricultural tractor in working order on target date of 20‑i2‑1971‑Member, Federal Land Commission, however, calling for record of case and holding petitioner not proved to have owned a tractor on such date and consequently not entitled to retain addi tional area‑Order of Member, Federal Land Commission, held, passed with cogent reasons and lawful authority and no malice on his part being alleged, petition challenging his order dismissed.

M. M. Pirzada for Appellant.

Naqi Mliza for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 1st September, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.