Find a Lawyer

SHAH HALI versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

12, 40 and 43 of the suit for recovery of shares, production and removal of the tenant's non-payment of rent by the tenant by the tenant, despite several orders against it being approved. Not correct to show that the tenant had offered or paid for the disputed period to the landlord, such orders indicate that each time the landlord receives the shares If the Revenue Officer had to approach, such orders passed against the tenant would result in a permanent default on his offer or failure to pay. The tenant was given the status. Hessa Batai had expelled herself

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2009 PLD 494
• LEATHERWARE (PVT.) LTD:, SIALKOT through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2009 PTD 497
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2009 PCrLJ 497
• MUHAMMAD ASIF alias ASSA v. State 2009 YLR 498
• Syed SHABBIR TAQI KAZMI v. Mst. SADAF ZAHRA 2009 PLD 501
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2009 PLD 504
• MUBASHAR IQBAL CHEEMA v. CANTONMENT BOARD 2009 PLD 506
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2009 PCrLJ 506

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocate from Swatmingora lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes