SALEEM-UD-DIN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION
O XVI, R 1 and O XVII, R 3 End of Evidence for Testimony of Plaintiffs Regularly Applying for Diet Money and Other Expenses for Appeal of Witnesses for five years on applications filed under O XVI, R 1 CPC Appeal to court on petitions filed despite intervals. The evidence of the witnesses could not be recorded, therefore, the trial court closed the evidence of the plaintiffs, no fault of the plaintiffs in the case of validity, validity of witnesses or presence of witnesses was ever filed by the High Court. No objection was raised that the dietary money or process fee was not deposited, the defendants fulfilled their responsibility and did not need to be pressured further, and it was up to the court to ensure the presence of witnesses on whom An order passed by the trial court using the review jurisdiction, which There is evidence. Plaintiffs were closed allowing revision of circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
