Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1979, decided on 8th May, 1980.
---O. IX, r. 8 &, O. XVII, r. 2 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 163‑Words "hearing of suit" in O. IX, r. 8 and O. XVII, r. 2 Used in a definite sense‑Expression refers to determination of questions resulting in final determination of suit, filing of written statement, recording of evidence, hearing of arguments rind rendering judgment‑‑Date in question fixed for notice to counsel of plaintiff ‑Issue of notice or its service on counsel not proved on record'‑Date fixed, held, not date of hearing and provisions of O. XVII, r, 2 and O. IX, r. 8 not applicable.‑[Interpretation of statutes].
Ghulam Farid‑Muhammad Latif v. Central Bank of India Ltd. P L D 1954 Lah. 575 ; Mst. Barkat Bibi v. Fateh Ali P L D 1949 Lah. 434 Grimault & Co. v. Charan Das & Sons A I R 1934 Lah. 237 ; Mahesha Mal Dayal Das v. Muhammad Jamil A I R 1929 Lah. 374 ; Sheikh Muhammad v. Mst. Rukmina Kunwar A I R 1946 All. 506 ; Rarnswaroop Reghuwardayal and others v. Mata Parsad Prabhudayal A I R 1952 Madh. Pra. 8 and Manohar Das v. Birandasi Sheikhupurian A I R 1936 Lah. 280 and Khalid Mahmood v. State P I. D 1970 Lah. 470 ref.
Ch. Muhammad Hanif for, Appellant.
Manzoor Ahmed for Respondents.
Date of Institution : 2nd June, 1979.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer