Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR AHMAD versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT


In section 12 (ii) the appellant's retirement performance was deemed inappropriate for many years, the appellant also stated that under fraud, dishonesty and suspension, penalties were also imposed for negligence in the circumstances.

1980 P L C (C. S.) 579 (1)

[Service Tribunal Punjab]

Present: M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman, Mazhar Munir and M. Hafeezur Rehman, Members

NOOR AHMAD

Versus

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

Appeal No. 282 of 1979, decided on 23rd January, 1980.

Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1970)‑‑‑

‑‑‑ S. 12(ii)‑Retirement‑Performance of appellant adjudged to be poor in a number of years‑Appellant also reported as corrupt, dishonest and also remaining under suspension‑Penalty of stoppage of increment also imposed for negligence‑Retirement order in circumstances, held, unexceptional.

Appellant in person.

Muhammad Iqbal, Revenue Clerk for Respondent.

Date of hearing :14th January, 1980.

JUDGMENT

M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).‑

The record has been produced. A perusal of the record reveals that the performance of the appellant had been adjudged to be poor in a number of years‑1976 and 1977. The Reporting Officer observed that he was corrupt, dishonest and had remained under suspension. On 6‑12‑1977 he was penalised under rule 4 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 by stopping his increment for one year without future effect for his failure to look after 11.74 acres area during Kharif 1976. The action was taken after proper investigation against him. In the circumstances, the order of his retirement passed by the XEN D, G. Khan, on 28‑8‑1978 appears to be unexceptional. We, therefore, find no good ground to interfere in the order. The appeal is accordingly rejected in limine.

Appeal rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Noor kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.