Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MRS. GULZAR, IQBAL versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT


Section 4 National Assessment School teachers were charged extra as PTC as a JT teacher on claims for Section E Grade before the national date, no trial, held, to support the claim. Appeal dismissed

1980 P L C (C.S.) 279(1)

[Service Tribunal Punjab]

Present : M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman, Mazhar Munir and S. Hafeez‑ur‑Rehman, Members

MRS. GULZAR, IQBAL

Versus

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Appeal No. 340/101 of 1977, decided on 30th December, 1979.

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑--

‑ S. 4‑Claim of Teacher of nationalised school for S. E. T. grade ‑from certain date prior to nationalisation‑Service nationalised as J. V. Teacher with additional charge as P. T. C. ‑No case, held, made out to support claim‑Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).‑--

Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellant joined the Model Girls High School, Model Town, Lahore, on 18th September, 1950 in the B. T. Grade. The appellant was then transferred by the Model Town Co‑operative Society to the Junior Model School, Model Town. The Government vide M. L. R. No. 118 took over the control of the aforesaid School on 1st October, 1972 and from that date the appellant was drawing the 13. T. Grade. The appellant continued to enjoy this scale till July 1974 when she was given a junior pay scale of P. T. C. She was awarded SET scale with effect from December, 1975.

2. Both the parties have been heard. The appellant has prayed that the respondent be ordered to treat her previous service from 18th Septem ber, 1950 instead of 10th December, 1975 in the SET scale as it is against facts and law and is in violation of M. L. R. The Government's contention is that according to the record the service of the appellant was addition nationalized as J. V. Teacher and she also worked as P. T. C. in addition. The appellant has not been able to make out a case and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.