Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

UMER DRAZ versus STATE


Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 496 A / 363/376/360 B, the abduction grant made two statements under section 164, CR PC made serious allegations: against the complainant. In his first statement and fully incorporating the accused, his second statement became one of the further investigations into the accused's case in the presence of two contradictory statements of the kidnapper, which is the testimony of the kidnapper who made different statements at different times. This will be considered with great caution and caution, especially when determining the legal impact. The aforementioned statement in which the accused was charged did not have any significance for the abductor's vaginal pressure 18 days after the incident during his medical examination, especially in the absence of the abductor. In the absence of conflicting statements from the chemical inspector of, no strong confrontation can be relied upon. Accepted bail in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.