CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF (NAZAM-E-ALLA AUQAF) versus SAIN GHULAM AHMED
Section 42 (11) (d) (E) and (12) Direct Appeal Against the High Court Scope Decision Limiting the Change of Direct Appeal for Leave of Appeal of the Appeal to the Supreme Court Had requested that a direct appeal be filed on the misunderstanding. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court (1999 WLR 1308), which observed that when a direct appeal was competent, the subject matter of the lower court and the High Court was not less than Rs. 50,000. , Four months after the date of the announcement of the High Court decision, the petition was moved to convert the appeal into leave for appeal, while the order / decision of the ban on filing the appeal for appeal to the Supreme Court. It was sixty days. Even if the appellant was misled by the judgment, it was ordered to file the appeal as an appeal for leave, immediately after the declaration of judgment. Or the lawyer for the appellant within a period of sixty days could not offer any explanation for filing the petition even four months after the declaration of negligence, was not entitled to a delay, especially when he did not move. Was. Any appeal for condolences on this delay was filed directly by the appellant not being eligible for the Supreme Court, in which case he was dismissed.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
