Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALI ABBAS versus ALLAH BAKHSH


O XLIX, r 6 The parties' affidavit with the request for compromise, as well as the agreement signed by the Advocates on the record of both parties, have no substantial legal and express appeal in which the order under the disputed matters in the application The name has been approved.
1980 S C M R 574

Present : Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

Syed ALI ABBAS‑Petitioner

Versus

ALLAH BAKHSH AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 543 of 1976, decided on 11th February, 1980.

(On appeal from the judgments and orders of the Lahore High Court dated 17‑3‑1976 and 23‑4‑1976 in W. P. No. 1073‑R/74).

Supreme Court Roles, 1956‑

‑‑O. XLIX, r. 6‑Compromise application accompanied by affidavit of parties and signed by Advocates‑on‑Record of both parties-- Agreement appearing to be quite lawful and apparently containing nothing to take exception to‑Disposal of petition ordered in terms of compromise embodied in application.

A. R. Shaukat, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.

M. A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.

Date of bearing: 11th February 1980.

ORDER

KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.

‑In this case the parties have filed an application under Order XLIX. rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, praying that it may be decided in the terms of the compromise as contained in paragraph 3 of the aforesaid application. The application is accompanied by an affidavit of Mst. Murtazai Begum alias Naseem Begum widow of Syed Ali Abbas and the affidavit of Allah Bakhsh son of Chandia, respondent No. 1, in the case. According to this compromise the parties have agreed that "(i) the portion transferred to the respondents be allowed to remain intact ; (it) the passage 3'.1"x 16' be allowed to be used by both the parties i.e. petitioner and respondent No. 1. The other passage leading to the first floor transferred to petitioner measuring 4' x 11' is however the exclusive ownership of the present petitioner. The site‑plan signed by both the parties is enclosed marked as "AA"; (iii) the rest of the entire residential accommodation along with the small shop shall vest in favour of present petitioner". It is further stated that respondent No. 1 has undertaken not to interfere in the residential accommodation and shop transferred to Syed Ali Abbas (deceased) now represented by his widow Mst. Murtazai Begum. The application is also signed by the learned Advocates‑on‑Record for both the parties. The agreement seems to be quite lawful, apparently there is nothing to take exception to it. The present petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise as embodied in the relevant application.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.