Section 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 345 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Appeal of Defendants Appealing Their Evidence on the basis of Compromise, Approving Appeal of Evidence Filed Trial judges reached between the parties who had been requested to confirm the deceased's legal heritage and to confirm the authenticity of the agreement, recording the statements of the adult legal heirs, in which they said that they had sent the two accused. Is forgiven in the name of Allah. And they didn't mind if the trial judge's report acquitted the accused, they reliably proved that the legal heirs of the victim voluntarily and indeed after the settlement with the defendants as a retrial. Used to acquire land and forgive them in the name of Allah. Allah Almighty added in return the shares of the minor sons of the deceased. The settlement was between the accused and the legal heirs of the deceased, which will surely foster a cordial relationship between the parties and the section 2302 (b) pp. The conviction and sentence of the accused under C were set aside and they were acquitted of the charges. On the basis of the agreement, the offense under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was disputed, as the parties had compromised on the important / important offense of murder, it was allowed and the accused also charged under Section 7. Was acquitted. (1) (c) The conviction and punishment of the perpetrators of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 were set aside and on the basis of compromise they were acquitted of the accused, the accused was ordered to be released.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
