Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIRECTOR-GENERAL PAKISTAN COAST GUARDS versus ABRAMJEE


Article 185 (3) of the Import and Export (Control) Act (1950 XXIIIx, section 3 (1) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), section 156: 69 and 171 read with notification RO 1426). 1) / 73 dated October 5, 1973, section RO 1264 (k) / 1968 dated July 24, 1968, section RO 920 (1) / 3 dated June 25, 1973 and section RO: 30 (1) / 73 dated Vehicle trafficking on January 4, 1973 was not heeded to the provisions of Section 350, Act XXIX of 1950, seized by the High Court and several orders were issued from time to time, according to the High Court. To go into the questions of being or not Errrrrrrrr is considered to be smuggling or importing counterfeit licenses such that for a period of time, cars are included in the prohibited list except for a valid permit, and the officers of the Coast Guard, Junior Commissioned Officers. Not below the rank, it can affect the possession of corrupt vehicles. Need a counseling test, go to the app

1980 S C M R 154

Present : Hamoodur Rahman, C. J., Anwarul Haq and Muhammad Gul, JJ

DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, PAKISTAN COAST GUARDS ETC.‑ Petitioners

versus

ABRAMJEE ETC.‑ Respondents

Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 28 to 32 and 44 of 1975 decided on 8th August, 1975.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑‑ Art. 185 (3)‑Imports and Exports (Control) Act (XXXIX of 1950, S. 3 (1)‑Customs Act (IV of 1969), Ss. 156 to :69 & 171 read with Notifications Nos. S. R. O. 1426 (1)/73 dated 5th October, 1973, S. R. O. 1264 (K)/1968 dated 24th July, 1968, S. R. O. 920 (1)/3 dated 25th June, 1973 & S. R. O: 30 (1)/73 dated 4th January, 1973‑Smuggling of cars‑Seizure by Coast Guards‑High Court's attention not having been drawn to provisions of S. 3, Act XXXIX of 1950 and various orders issued thereunder from time to time, High Court accordingly considering it unnecessary to go into ques tions of offending cars being or not being smuggled or being import ed against forged permits‑Contentions that throughout material period cars remained on prohibited list being not importable except under a valid permit, and Officers of Coast Guards, not below rank of junior commissioned officer, could effect seizure of offending cars Law points raised by counsel needing examination, leave to appeal granted.

Naeemuddin, Standing Counsel for the Federal Government.

JUDGMENT

HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.

‑The above six petitions are directed against a consolidated judgment of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan dated 16th December, 1974, by which six writ petitions by the respondents in each petition, were allowed and certain orders made by the Customs Authorities under the Customs Act, 1969 (Act IV of 1969) in respect of certain cars allegedly Smuggled" into Pakistan and seized by the Coast) Guard Officers on different dates and at different places were quashed.

The impugned judgment proceeded on the short ground that the seizure of the offending cars by the Coast Guards was illegal, firstly because of want of authority in the officers of the Coastal, Guards to seize smuggled goods and secondly, that there was nothing to show that the cars were among the prohibited goods which cannot be imported except under the valid import permit. It appears that the only notification to which the attention of the learned Judges in the High Court was invited was S. R. O. 1426 (1)/73 dated the Stn October 1973 issued by the Central Board of Revenue under subsection (a) of section 2 and subsection (2) of section 156 of the Customs Act, by which the import of 26 items was prohibited in super session of notifications issued in the relevant behalf. Cars were not among the items prohibited. From this it was inferred that there was no prohibition against the import of cars into Pakistan, arid a fortiori, the cars in question could not be treated. as "smuggled" within the meaning of section 2 (s) of the Customs Act. It appears that the Deputy Attorney, General also conceded that officers of Coast Guards seized the cars in ques tion. On these premises, reliving on a judgment of the former Karachi Bench in S. M. Yusuf v. Collector of Customs, the learned Judges came to the conclusion that any consequential action taken by the Customs Officers following the illegal seizure of the cars was itself illegal. In reaching that conclusion, it is a pity that it was assumed that the notification of the 5th October 1973 was exhaustive on the subject. The attention of the learned Judges does not seem to have been dram to the provisions of section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950 (Act XXXIX of 1950) and the various orders issued under section 3 (1) ibid, from time to time. Accord ingly. the learned Judges considered it unnecessary to go into the further question whether or not the offending cars were ' smuggled" or as the case may be imported against forged permits, as the show‑cause notice issued in some cases tended to show.

Mr. Naeemuddin, learned Standing Counsel for the Federal Govern ment appearing in support of these petitions, however, relied on order S. R. O. 1264 (K)/1968 dated the 24th July 1968 issued under subsection (1) of section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act of 1950 by which a large variety of goods set out in Schedule 11 to the notification including cars are prohibited from being imported in Pakistan except under an import licence or an import permit issued by the Chief Controller o: any Controller or Deputy Controller or Assistant Controller of Imports and Exports. By virtue of subsection (3) ibid all goods to which an order issued under subsection (1) applies, are "deemed to be goods" of which import or export has been prohibited or restricted under section 16 of the Customs Act of 1969.

The above notification was replaced by S.R.O. 920 (1)/3 dated 25th June, 1973. Under the new notification cars are again listed among the prohibited goods. Therefore it was stressed by the Learned Standing Counsel that throughout during the material period cars remained on the prohibited list and could not have been imported into Pakistan except under a valid import permit issued by any of the above‑mentioned officers.

Learned Standing Counsel also drew our attention to S. R. O. 30 (1)/73 dated 4th January 1973 issued by the Central Board of Revenue by which officers of the Coast Guards not below the rank of Junior Commissioned Officers without their respective jurisdiction were entrusted with the function of Officers of Customs under sections 157 to 169 and 171 of the Customs Act. This it was submitted gave ample authority to the Coast Guard Officers, who in the instant case had requisite rank to seize the offending cars. Learned counsel, therefore argued that impugned judgment of the High Court entirely proceeded on a misconception of law.

The law points raised by learned counsel need examination. Accordingly, we grant leave in these six petitions.

Appeals shall be heard on the present record as soon as may be after e the vacation. The respondents will, however, be at liberty to file any additional documents.

Respondents shall not in any manner dispose of and otherwise pledge the offending cars in the meantime.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.