PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, SARGODHA versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ
Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 2002, R222 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2 for the suit declaration, for alternative relief of damages to the mining site With the provisional order requesting the approval of the exempt claimant, his complaint was that after the approval of the mining lease, the entire mining site was not handed over to him during the lease period, the mining lease and Punjab mining between the parties. Under the Concession Rules 2002, a special law will be implemented under which the Contract Act 1872 will apply. The Special Relief Act, 1877 shall not apply to such lease agreement. According to the Punjab Mining Concession Rules 2002, KR 222, the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of the proportionate payments made to the plaintiff, by the plaintiff himself by substitution. Translated your complaint and the damage done in certain terms. The plaintiff's lawsuit settled for compensation claims for damages, therefore, was not eligible for a permanent or temporary injunction temporarily dismissed under conditions for a dismissal \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
