Article 2 30at Although the reprisal of convicted witnesses was related to the deceased, the evidence of a witness cannot be excluded on the basis of the mere fact that the relevant witness was as competent a witness as any other witness affected by the evidence; And he had no intention of engaging the accused in a false case; the defense did not suggest any hostility to the witnesses with the accused, nor was any such evidence brought to the record, Some suggestions could not be made to declare a violation unusual. All the alleged injuries to the accused person were in nature and the accused person cannot be blamed for the injuries solely to the complaining party. In the absence of a specific prescription of the suspect that the incident did not take place on the complainant's charge, the incident took place in a different way. And the accused attacked them, it cannot be said that the witness had deliberately suppressed the suspect's injuries. The police failed to investigate the alleged counter-narcotics investigation, when, when the defendant submitted a response, the investigating agency inquired. Was mandatory. The affirmative and credible trial court and the Shariah Court (AJ&K) relied heavily on the evidence of the witnesses, trusting in the evidence of the witnesses. And the Ballistic Express reported that the crime branch had been evacuated with the same weapon of crime, that is, the 12 bore guns recovered on the indictment of the suspected post-mortem report, suggesting that the deceased's death was a fire. Was caused by weapons. The contentious motive was substantiated by the complainant's statement There is no contradiction between the FIR and the witness statements, for example F
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
