Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 bail, cancellation of the petition for the petitioner / complainant who was the victim's father was affected by the concurrent orders of the Magistrate and Additional Sessions Judge, The respondents / accused persons, whom the applicant designated in his statement under Section 64, CRPC, were released without giving notice to the complainant and giving him an opportunity to be heard. And the Adel Sessions Judge did not revoke his bail even though the conviction was clear because of the introduction and implementation of the Islamic concept of providing justice in criminal cases, which involved injury or conviction. Therefore, the right to compensation is the personal right of the victim. Or the offspring of a victim, the Supreme Court consistently held that they had the right to be heard before an accused's accompanying orders were passed. In the present case, both the courts overlooked the right of legal inheritance. The deceased will be heard, orders for non-bailable bail were set aside and the accused's bail was granted because the complaining party was informed without notice.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
